Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMRSX vs RNWBX
EMRSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMRSX vs RNWBX
JPMorgan Emerging Mkts Rsrch Enh Eq R6
Price$18.64
Change+$0.48 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds New World R2
Price$83.30
Change+$1.72 (+2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.55B
EMRSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMRSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMRSX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. EMRSX (2.18B). EMRSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMRSX (2.21) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMRSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMRSX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMRSX (0.41). EMRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMRSX: RNWBX (250) vs EMRSX (15000000). EMRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. RNWBX (6.13). EMRSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.14 vs. RNWBX (24.76).
| EMRSX | RNWBX | EMRSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.67 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.531 | 10.496 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 250 | 6,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 67.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 0.13 | 1,644% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | 6.13 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.12 | 27.90 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.14 | 24.76 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement