Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMRSX vs RNWBX
EMRSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMRSX vs RNWBX
JPMorgan Emerging Mkts Rsrch Enh Eq R6
Price$21.06
Change-$0.19 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
EMRSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMRSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMRSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. EMRSX (1.96B). EMRSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMRSX (1.81) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMRSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMRSX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMRSX (0.41). EMRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMRSX: RNWBX (250) vs EMRSX (15000000). EMRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.29 vs. RNWBX (18.50). EMRSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.64 vs. RNWBX (16.42).
| EMRSX | RNWBX | EMRSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.67 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.645 | 23.046 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 250 | 6,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 74.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 0.12 | 1,541% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.29 | 18.50 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.33 | 43.20 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.64 | 16.42 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement