Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMRSX vs RNWBX
EMRSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMRSX vs RNWBX
EMRSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMRSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMRSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. EMRSX (2.23B). EMRSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMRSX (2.97) vs RNWBX (0.41). EMRSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMRSX (8 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than EMRSX (0.43). EMRSX (48.00) and RNWBX (46.00) have comparable annual turnover. RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMRSX: RNWBX (250) vs EMRSX (15000000). EMRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.72 vs. RNWBX (19.70). EMRSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.76 vs. RNWBX (11.62).
| EMRSX | RNWBX | EMRSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.66 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.048 | 15.665 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 250 | 6,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 88.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 0.41 | 716% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.72 | 19.70 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.98 | 47.31 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.76 | 11.62 | 325% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement