Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSLX vs FNWFX
EMSLX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs FNWFX
EMSLX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. FNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a Buy and FNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EMSLX (27.5M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than EMSLX: FNWFX (1.24) vs EMSLX (0.91). EMSLX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: EMSLX (20 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). EMSLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). EMSLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: EMSLX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.43 vs. EMSLX (28.77). EMSLX return over 5 years is better than : 26.14 vs. FNWFX (21.16).
| EMSLX | FNWFX | EMSLX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.57 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.57 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.240 | 18.824 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.5M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.77 | 31.43 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.89 | 58.25 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.14 | 21.16 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers