Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSLX vs RNWAX
EMSLX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs RNWAX
EMSLX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. EMSLX (27.2M). EMSLX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMSLX (0.91) vs RNWAX (0.49). EMSLX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMSLX (20 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). EMSLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSLX: RNWAX (250) vs EMSLX (1000). EMSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.45 vs. RNWAX (28.87). EMSLX return over 5 years is better than : 27.18 vs. RNWAX (14.38).
| EMSLX | RNWAX | EMSLX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.66 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.66 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.193 | 17.069 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.49 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.45 | 28.87 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.63 | 52.58 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.18 | 14.38 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.50 | 112.58 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement