Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSLX vs RNWAX
EMSLX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs RNWAX
EMSLX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EMSLX (26.3M). EMSLX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMSLX (0.92) vs RNWAX (0.49). EMSLX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMSLX (20 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). EMSLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSLX: RNWAX (250) vs EMSLX (1000). RNWAX (22.31) and EMSLX (21.31) have marching annual gain over last year. EMSLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.20 vs. RNWAX (12.42).
| EMSLX | RNWAX | EMSLX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.66 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.66 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.269 | 16.021 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.3M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.49 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.31 | 22.31 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 47.26 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.20 | 12.42 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.85 | 109.96 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement