Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSLX vs RNWAX
EMSLX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs RNWAX
EMSLX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. RNWAX commentary
Sep 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a Hold and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. EMSLX (25.8M). EMSLX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMSLX (0.93) vs RNWAX (0.50). EMSLX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMSLX (20 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). EMSLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSLX: RNWAX (250) vs EMSLX (1000). RNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.13 vs. EMSLX (15.94). EMSLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.50 vs. RNWAX (11.53).
| EMSLX | RNWAX | EMSLX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.66 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.66 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.540 | 15.412 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.8M | 88.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.50 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.94 | 19.13 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.66 | 47.01 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.50 | 11.53 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.66 | 97.87 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement