Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSLX vs RNWBX
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Investor
Price$21.04
Change-$0.36 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.87M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. EMSLX (21.9M). EMSLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSLX (3.05) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMSLX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSLX (19 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMSLX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSLX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSLX (1000). EMSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.50 vs. RNWBX (18.50). EMSLX return over 5 years is better than : 30.98 vs. RNWBX (16.42).
| EMSLX | RNWBX | EMSLX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.67 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.149 | 23.046 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9M | 74.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 0.12 | 2,600% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.50 | 18.50 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.19 | 43.20 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.98 | 16.42 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.80 | 82.43 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement