Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSLX vs RNWBX
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Investor
Price$21.84
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.72M
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.33
Change-$0.26 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.4B
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.4B vs. EMSLX (22.7M). EMSLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSLX (3.12) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMSLX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSLX (19 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMSLX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSLX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSLX (1000). EMSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.82 vs. RNWBX (13.28). EMSLX return over 5 years is better than : 47.41 vs. RNWBX (24.59).
| EMSLX | RNWBX | EMSLX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.67 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.020 | 24.174 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.7M | 75.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.12 | 0.12 | 2,587% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.82 | 13.28 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.80 | 56.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.41 | 24.59 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.93 | 87.09 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers