Ad is loading...
EMSLX vs RNWBX
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Investor
Price$18.17
Change+$0.25 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.76M
American Funds New World R2
Price$80.09
Change+$0.38 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.93B
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. RNWBX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 65.9B vs. EMSLX (23.8M). EMSLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSLX (3.85) vs RNWBX (0.14). EMSLX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSLX (19 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMSLX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSLX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSLX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.54 vs. EMSLX (3.81). EMSLX return over 5 years is better than : 61.71 vs. RNWBX (39.44).
| EMSLX | RNWBX | EMSLX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.67 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.630 | 8.375 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8M | 65.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 0.14 | 2,711% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.81 | 4.54 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.15 | 24.70 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.71 | 39.44 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.17 | 45.55 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers