Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSLX vs RNWBX
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Investor
Price$19.50
Change-$0.08 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.47M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.18
Change-$0.22 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.42B
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.4B vs. EMSLX (24.5M). EMSLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSLX (3.43) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMSLX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSLX (19 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMSLX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSLX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSLX (1000). EMSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. RNWBX (15.47). EMSLX return over 5 years is better than : 41.05 vs. RNWBX (21.91).
| EMSLX | RNWBX | EMSLX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.67 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.165 | 17.199 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.5M | 70.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 0.13 | 2,657% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.89 | 15.47 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.64 | 29.01 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.05 | 21.91 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.36 | 70.12 | 90% |