Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSQX vs RNWHX
EMSQX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMSQX vs RNWHX
EMSQX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSQX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSQX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EMSQX (26.6M). EMSQX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMSQX (1.43) vs RNWHX (1.15). EMSQX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMSQX (29 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMSQX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSQX: RNWHX (250) vs EMSQX (500000). RNWHX (28.64) and EMSQX (27.52) have marching annual gain over last year. EMSQX return over 5 years is better than : 27.86 vs. RNWHX (19.90).
| EMSQX | RNWHX | EMSQX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.72 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.72 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.687 | 17.296 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.6M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.15 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.52 | 28.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.51 | 51.63 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.86 | 19.90 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.36 | 126.75 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement