Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMTAX vs MEDGX
EMTAX vs MEDGX Comparison
Open Charts EMTAX vs MEDGX
Transamerica Emerging Markets Debt A
Price$9.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.02M
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R4
Price$12.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.47B
EMTAX vs MEDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMTAX vs. MEDGX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMTAX is a Hold and MEDGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDGX has more cash in the bank: 7.47B vs. EMTAX (243M). EMTAX pays higher dividends than MEDGX: EMTAX (6.40) vs MEDGX (5.87). EMTAX was incepted earlier than MEDGX: EMTAX (14 years) vs MEDGX (17 years). EMTAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than MEDGX (0.82). EMTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 151.00 vs. MEDGX (58.00). MEDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMTAX: MEDGX (0) vs EMTAX (1000). EMTAX (7.37) and MEDGX (7.36) have marching annual gain over last year. EMTAX (10.98) and MEDGX (10.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EMTAX | MEDGX | EMTAX / MEDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.81 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.82 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.398 | 6.734 | 125% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 243M | 7.47B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.40 | 5.87 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.37 | 7.36 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.38 | 28.65 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.98 | 10.76 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.04 | 46.45 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement