Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMTAX vs MEDGX
EMTAX vs MEDGX Comparison
Open Charts EMTAX vs MEDGX
EMTAX vs MEDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMTAX vs. MEDGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMTAX is a Hold and MEDGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDGX has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. EMTAX (265M). MEDGX (5.58) and EMTAX (5.49) have matching dividends . EMTAX was incepted earlier than MEDGX: EMTAX (15 years) vs MEDGX (18 years). EMTAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than MEDGX (0.83). EMTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 199.00 vs. MEDGX (69.00). MEDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMTAX: MEDGX (0) vs EMTAX (1000). EMTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. MEDGX (5.55). EMTAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.19 vs. MEDGX (12.56).
| EMTAX | MEDGX | EMTAX / MEDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.82 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.83 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.053 | 1.935 | 261% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 7.55B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.49 | 5.58 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 5.55 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.12 | 32.09 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.19 | 12.56 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.79 | 41.23 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement