Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs FTHF
EMXC vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs FTHF
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$67.01
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Volume$6.83K
Net AssetsN/A
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$29.69
Change+$0.22 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.42M
EMXC vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. FTHF commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a Hold and FTHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EMXC: FTHF (41.864) vs EMXC (22.394). EMXC was incepted earlier than FTHF: EMXC (8 years) vs FTHF (2 years). EMXC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | FTHF | EMXC / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 22.394 | 41.864 | 53% |
| Net Assets | N/A | 53.4M | - |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.75 | 33% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 30.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 2.70 | 2.70 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -0.89% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| INFY - EMXC | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and OUT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and OUT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
More | ||||