Investors evaluating emerging markets exposure often seek alternatives to broad indexes that include significant China allocations. The EMXC and FTHF ETFs both target emerging markets while excluding or de-emphasizing China, yet they employ distinct methodologies. EMXC delivers straightforward passive replication of a capitalization-weighted benchmark, whereas FTHF applies thematic screens designed to identify companies aligned with human flourishing principles. These structural differences make the pair relevant for comparison when investors weigh cost, diversification, and thematic alignment within similar geographic mandates.
The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) is a passive, index-tracking exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The index covers large- and mid-cap companies across approximately 25 emerging markets excluding China, representing roughly 85% of the free-float adjusted market capitalization in those countries. The fund typically holds 620-640 securities, providing broad diversification. Top holdings commonly include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and Samsung Electronics, with notable exposure to Taiwan, South Korea, and India. Sector allocations emphasize information technology (approximately 45-52%) and financials (approximately 17-19%), followed by industrials, materials, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.25%. The ETF uses a market-capitalization weighting methodology with periodic rebalancing aligned to the index. It operates as an open-end fund structure with strong liquidity characteristics typical of iShares products.
The First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) tracks the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index through a rules-based, market-capitalization-weighted approach. The strategy selects large- and mid-cap emerging markets companies that meet predefined criteria related to human flourishing, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio of approximately 100-110 holdings. Top 10 holdings typically account for over 50% of assets. Sector exposure shows a pronounced tilt toward technology (approximately 50%) and financial services (approximately 24%), with smaller allocations to basic materials, energy, and industrials. The expense ratio is 0.75%. Launched in late 2023, the fund employs fundamental screening layered on top of market-cap weighting and rebalances according to index rules. It functions as an open-end ETF with moderate liquidity reflecting its smaller asset base and thematic focus.
Both ETFs operate within the diversified emerging markets equity category, where investors seek growth opportunities beyond developed markets while managing China-specific risks. Macroeconomic drivers include global interest rate cycles, supply-chain diversification away from China, and rising demand for technology and financial services in Asia and Latin America. Regulatory developments around data privacy, environmental standards, and corporate governance in emerging economies continue to influence company selection. Capital flows into ex-China emerging markets have remained resilient amid geopolitical tensions and domestic policy shifts in key markets such as India and Taiwan. Sector risks encompass currency volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and varying economic growth trajectories across the region.
In recent market cycles, EMXC has delivered exposure aligned with broad emerging markets ex-China performance, benefiting from strength in technology leaders in Taiwan and South Korea. Its lower expense ratio supports more efficient compounding over longer horizons. FTHF, with its thematic overlay, exhibits greater concentration and potentially higher volatility due to the smaller number of holdings and qualitative screens. During periods of sector rotation favoring technology or financials, the two funds may converge; however, FTHF’s additional filters can lead to differentiated results when human-flourishing criteria favor or exclude specific names. Relative positioning favors EMXC for investors prioritizing diversification and cost efficiency, while FTHF appeals to those seeking targeted exposure aligned with specific non-financial metrics.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener
Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across hundreds of holdings, and straightforward passive replication of a well-established benchmark, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) for most investors seeking core emerging markets ex-China exposure. The thematic constraints and higher cost of FTHF introduce additional layers that may suit narrower mandates but reduce overall efficiency in a general allocation context.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| EMXC | FTHF | EMXC / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 39.901 | 49.580 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 25.4B | 127M | 20,000% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.75 | 33% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 38.00 | 39% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 3.03 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 3 years | - |
| EMXC | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with XP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then XP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| XP - EMXC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 49% Loosely correlated | -7.16% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| NU - EMXC | 47% Loosely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and GFI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and GFI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | -1.10% | ||
| GFI - FTHF | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.11% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 25% Poorly correlated | -7.16% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.68% | ||
More | ||||