EMXC
Price
$93.87
Change
-$7.81 (-7.68%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
25.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTHF
Price
$44.81
Change
-$4.56 (-9.24%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
127.17M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMXC vs FTHF

Header iconEMXC vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs FTHFBanner chart's image
EMXC vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) vs. First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF)

Key Takeaways

  • EMXC provides broad passive exposure to large- and mid-cap emerging markets equities excluding China, tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index with approximately 620-640 holdings.
  • FTHF follows a thematic rules-based strategy focused on emerging markets companies that meet criteria for human flourishing, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio of roughly 100-110 holdings.
  • Expense ratios differ significantly: EMXC at 0.25% versus FTHF at 0.75%, reflecting the cost of thematic screening versus broad market-cap indexing.
  • Sector allocations in both tilt toward technology and financials, yet EMXC offers greater geographic diversification across Taiwan, South Korea, India, and other markets while FTHF applies additional qualitative filters.
  • EMXC represents a lower-cost, diversified approach to emerging markets ex-China, while FTHF targets a narrower subset emphasizing specific non-financial characteristics.
  • Both ETFs suit investors seeking emerging markets exposure outside traditional China allocations but differ in strategy type, concentration, and fee structure.

Introduction

Investors evaluating emerging markets exposure often seek alternatives to broad indexes that include significant China allocations. The EMXC and FTHF ETFs both target emerging markets while excluding or de-emphasizing China, yet they employ distinct methodologies. EMXC delivers straightforward passive replication of a capitalization-weighted benchmark, whereas FTHF applies thematic screens designed to identify companies aligned with human flourishing principles. These structural differences make the pair relevant for comparison when investors weigh cost, diversification, and thematic alignment within similar geographic mandates.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) Overview

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) is a passive, index-tracking exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The index covers large- and mid-cap companies across approximately 25 emerging markets excluding China, representing roughly 85% of the free-float adjusted market capitalization in those countries. The fund typically holds 620-640 securities, providing broad diversification. Top holdings commonly include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and Samsung Electronics, with notable exposure to Taiwan, South Korea, and India. Sector allocations emphasize information technology (approximately 45-52%) and financials (approximately 17-19%), followed by industrials, materials, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.25%. The ETF uses a market-capitalization weighting methodology with periodic rebalancing aligned to the index. It operates as an open-end fund structure with strong liquidity characteristics typical of iShares products.

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) Overview

The First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) tracks the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index through a rules-based, market-capitalization-weighted approach. The strategy selects large- and mid-cap emerging markets companies that meet predefined criteria related to human flourishing, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio of approximately 100-110 holdings. Top 10 holdings typically account for over 50% of assets. Sector exposure shows a pronounced tilt toward technology (approximately 50%) and financial services (approximately 24%), with smaller allocations to basic materials, energy, and industrials. The expense ratio is 0.75%. Launched in late 2023, the fund employs fundamental screening layered on top of market-cap weighting and rebalances according to index rules. It functions as an open-end ETF with moderate liquidity reflecting its smaller asset base and thematic focus.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the diversified emerging markets equity category, where investors seek growth opportunities beyond developed markets while managing China-specific risks. Macroeconomic drivers include global interest rate cycles, supply-chain diversification away from China, and rising demand for technology and financial services in Asia and Latin America. Regulatory developments around data privacy, environmental standards, and corporate governance in emerging economies continue to influence company selection. Capital flows into ex-China emerging markets have remained resilient amid geopolitical tensions and domestic policy shifts in key markets such as India and Taiwan. Sector risks encompass currency volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and varying economic growth trajectories across the region.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, EMXC has delivered exposure aligned with broad emerging markets ex-China performance, benefiting from strength in technology leaders in Taiwan and South Korea. Its lower expense ratio supports more efficient compounding over longer horizons. FTHF, with its thematic overlay, exhibits greater concentration and potentially higher volatility due to the smaller number of holdings and qualitative screens. During periods of sector rotation favoring technology or financials, the two funds may converge; however, FTHF’s additional filters can lead to differentiated results when human-flourishing criteria favor or exclude specific names. Relative positioning favors EMXC for investors prioritizing diversification and cost efficiency, while FTHF appeals to those seeking targeted exposure aligned with specific non-financial metrics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across hundreds of holdings, and straightforward passive replication of a well-established benchmark, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) for most investors seeking core emerging markets ex-China exposure. The thematic constraints and higher cost of FTHF introduce additional layers that may suit narrower mandates but reduce overall efficiency in a general allocation context.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EMXC vs. FTHF commentary
Jun 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a Hold and FTHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 25.4B vs. FTHF (127M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EMXC: FTHF (49.580) vs EMXC (39.901). EMXC was incepted earlier than FTHF: EMXC (9 years) vs FTHF (3 years). EMXC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover EMXC (15.00) vs EMXC (15.00).
EMXCFTHFEMXC / FTHF
Gain YTD39.90149.58080%
Net Assets25.4B127M20,000%
Total Expense Ratio0.250.7533%
Turnover15.0038.0039%
Yield2.043.0367%
Fund Existence9 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMXCFTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMXC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNHW52.032.98
+6.07%
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
BOEU34.741.86
+5.66%
Direxion Daily BA Bull 2X Shares
FFTY42.290.48
+1.15%
CapForce IBD® 50 ETF
EMLP43.390.28
+0.65%
First Trust North Amer Engy InfrasETF
XBB40.850.09
+0.21%
BondBloxx BB Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF

EMXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with XP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then XP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMXC
1D Price
Change %
EMXC100%
-1.28%
XP - EMXC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
LTM - EMXC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
CLS - EMXC
49%
Loosely correlated
-7.16%
TEL - EMXC
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
NU - EMXC
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.12%
More

FTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTHF and GFI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTHF and GFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTHF
1D Price
Change %
FTHF100%
-1.10%
GFI - FTHF
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
CLS - FTHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.16%
ABG - FTHF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
OUT - FTHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
SLM - FTHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.68%
More