| EMXC | OAEM | EMXC / OAEM | |
| Gain YTD | 46.364 | 40.434 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 26.4B | 134M | 19,701% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.25 | 20% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 42.00 | 36% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 0.58 | 351% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 4 years | - |
| EMXC | OAEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 77% | 16 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VEGA | 52.62 | 0.48 | +0.93% |
| AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | |||
| DBMF | 30.92 | 0.25 | +0.82% |
| iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
| FTCA | 7.40 | 0.03 | +0.34% |
| Franklin California Municipal Income ETF | |||
| IBMR | 25.36 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| JPO | 14.01 | -0.33 | -2.27% |
| YieldMax JP Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | +3.92% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| XP - EMXC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| GFI - EMXC | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OAEM has been loosely correlated with SUZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OAEM jumps, then SUZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OAEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAEM | 100% | +3.75% | ||
| SUZ - OAEM | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| NU - OAEM | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| MELI - OAEM | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| BBD - OAEM | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.04% | ||
| MMYT - OAEM | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
More | ||||