EMYB
Price
$17.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
132.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SQCF
Price
$15.52
Change
-$0.10 (-0.64%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
44.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMYB vs SQCF

Header iconEMYB vs SQCF Comparison
Open Charts EMYB vs SQCFBanner chart's image
Embassy Ban
Price$17.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.69K
Capitalization132.66M
Susquehanna Community Financial
Price$15.52
Change-$0.10 (-0.64%)
Volume$2.61K
Capitalization44.1M
EMYB vs SQCF Comparison Chart in %
EMYB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SQCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMYB vs. SQCF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMYB is a Hold and SQCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (EMYB: $17.35 vs. SQCF: $15.52)
Brand notoriety: EMYB and SQCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMYB: 1095% vs. SQCF: 111%
Market capitalization -- EMYB: $132.66M vs. SQCF: $44.1M
EMYB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $132.66M. SQCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $44.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMYB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSQCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMYB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SQCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMYB is a better buy in the long-term than SQCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMYB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMYB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SQCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SQCF is a better buy in the short-term than EMYB.

Price Growth

EMYB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while SQCF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMYB($133M) has a higher market cap than SQCF($44.1M). SQCF has higher P/E ratio than EMYB: SQCF (18.70) vs EMYB (10.39). SQCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.727 vs. EMYB (7.669). EMYB has less debt than SQCF: EMYB (0) vs SQCF (19.1M). EMYB has higher revenues than SQCF: EMYB (41.8M) vs SQCF (16.8M).
EMYBSQCFEMYB / SQCF
Capitalization133M44.1M302%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.66927.72728%
P/E Ratio10.3918.7056%
Revenue41.8M16.8M249%
Total Cash23.9MN/A-
Total Debt019.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMYB vs SQCF: Fundamental Ratings
EMYB
SQCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5277
SMR RATING
1..100
5373
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5419
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMYB's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (53). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (77). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (73). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

SQCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as EMYB (49). This means that SQCF’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

SQCF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMYB (54). This means that SQCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMYBSQCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMYB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SQCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA403.992.74
+0.68%
Tesla
AAPL268.561.12
+0.42%
Apple
SPY662.632.55
+0.39%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
GME20.42-0.08
-0.39%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X91465.990000-1482.882800
-1.60%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

EMYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMYB and SQCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMYB and SQCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMYB
1D Price
Change %
EMYB100%
+0.58%
SQCF - EMYB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLRK - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
FSRL - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
STBI - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTBK - EMYB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More

SQCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SQCF and PBAM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SQCF and PBAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQCF
1D Price
Change %
SQCF100%
N/A
PBAM - SQCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
LSBK - SQCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
EMYB - SQCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
CHMG - SQCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
BOTJ - SQCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
More