EMYB
Price
$17.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
132.65M
SQCF
Price
$15.52
Change
-$0.10 (-0.64%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
44.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMYB vs SQCF

Header iconEMYB vs SQCF Comparison
Open Charts EMYB vs SQCFBanner chart's image
Embassy Ban
Price$17.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$550
Capitalization132.65M
Susquehanna Community Financial
Price$15.52
Change-$0.10 (-0.64%)
Volume$2.61K
Capitalization44.1M
EMYB vs SQCF Comparison Chart in %
EMYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMYB vs. SQCF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMYB is a Hold and SQCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMYB: $17.35 vs. SQCF: $15.52)
Brand notoriety: EMYB and SQCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMYB: 7% vs. SQCF: 178%
Market capitalization -- EMYB: $132.65M vs. SQCF: $44.1M
EMYB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $132.65M. SQCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $44.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMYB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSQCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMYB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SQCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMYB is a better buy in the long-term than SQCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMYB’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMYB’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SQCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EMYB and SQCF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EMYB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while SQCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMYB($133M) has a higher market cap than SQCF($44.1M). SQCF has higher P/E ratio than EMYB: SQCF (18.70) vs EMYB (11.27). SQCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.727 vs. EMYB (7.669). EMYB has less debt than SQCF: EMYB (0) vs SQCF (19.1M). EMYB has higher revenues than SQCF: EMYB (41.8M) vs SQCF (16.8M).
EMYBSQCFEMYB / SQCF
Capitalization133M44.1M302%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.66927.72728%
P/E Ratio11.2718.7060%
Revenue41.8M16.8M249%
Total Cash23.9MN/A-
Total Debt019.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMYB vs SQCF: Fundamental Ratings
EMYB
SQCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4975
SMR RATING
1..100
5477
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4823
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMYB's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (46). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (75). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (77). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

SQCF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as EMYB (52). This means that SQCF’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

SQCF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as EMYB (48). This means that SQCF’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMYBSQCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
41%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BJCHF0.360.04
+13.80%
Beijing Capital International Airport Co., Ltd.
UNCFF75.860.01
+0.01%
UniCredito Spa
PYHOF0.06N/A
N/A
Playmates Holdings Ltd.
WRPT0.11N/A
N/A
WARPSPEED TAXI INC.
ZLNDY15.77-0.12
-0.76%
ZALANDO SE

EMYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMYB and SQCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMYB and SQCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMYB
1D Price
Change %
EMYB100%
N/A
SQCF - EMYB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLRK - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.55%
FSRL - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
STBI - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTBK - EMYB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More

SQCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SQCF and PBAM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SQCF and PBAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQCF
1D Price
Change %
SQCF100%
N/A
PBAM - SQCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
EMYB - SQCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOBS - SQCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
SSBP - SQCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - SQCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More