Advertisement
ENPH vs FSLR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENPH is a Hold and FSLR is a Buy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENPH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSLR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ENPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FSLR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
| ENPH | FSLR | ENPH / FSLR | |
| Capitalization | 16.4B | 18B | 91% |
| EBITDA | 597M | 1.21B | 49% |
| Gain YTD | -53.713 | 5.311 | -1,011% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.38 | 22.22 | 173% |
| Revenue | 2.29B | 3.32B | 69% |
| Total Cash | 1.7B | 2.1B | 81% |
| Total Debt | 1.3B | 624M | 208% |
ENPH | FSLR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSLR's Valuation (87) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ENPH (88) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENPH (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's SMR Rating (46) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FSLR (53) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew similarly to FSLR’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ENPH (66) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as ENPH (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
| ENPH | FSLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DSM | 5.64 | 0.02 | +0.36% |
| BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal | |||
| CGHM | 24.52 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | |||
| JHDV | 38.17 | N/A | N/A |
| JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF | |||
| GLOV | 55.19 | -0.10 | -0.17% |
| Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF | |||
| FILL | 23.96 | -0.07 | -0.27% |
| iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF | |||
ENPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENPH has been closely correlated with SEDG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENPH jumps, then SEDG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENPH | 100% | +5.58% | ||
| SEDG - ENPH | 78% Closely correlated | -5.31% | ||
| RUN - ENPH | 71% Closely correlated | +32.30% | ||
| FSLR - ENPH | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| CSIQ - ENPH | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| FCEL - ENPH | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
More | ||||
FSLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSLR has been loosely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSLR jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSLR | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| RUN - FSLR | 64% Loosely correlated | +32.30% | ||
| ARRY - FSLR | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| NXT - FSLR | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| SHLS - FSLR | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.25% | ||
| ENPH - FSLR | 56% Loosely correlated | +5.58% | ||
More | ||||