It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TEAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENPH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
TEAM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.16% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ENPH | TEAM | ENPH / TEAM | |
Capitalization | 16.4B | 50.2B | 33% |
EBITDA | 597M | -154.53M | -386% |
Gain YTD | -35.916 | -20.684 | 174% |
P/E Ratio | 38.38 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.29B | 3.89B | 59% |
Total Cash | 1.7B | 1.61B | 105% |
Total Debt | 1.3B | 1.27B | 102% |
ENPH | TEAM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ENPH's Valuation (92) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TEAM (79) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's SMR Rating (59) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ENPH (65) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TEAM (28) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH | TEAM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 16 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago86% | 2 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENPH has been closely correlated with SEDG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENPH jumps, then SEDG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ENPH | 100% | +1.01% | ||
SEDG - ENPH | 78% Closely correlated | +8.38% | ||
RUN - ENPH | 71% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
FSLR - ENPH | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.30% | ||
NOVA - ENPH | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
CSIQ - ENPH | 59% Loosely correlated | +15.66% | ||
More |