Advertisement
EPAC vs GEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAC is a Hold and GEF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- GEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while GEF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -4.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPAC is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.
GEF is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-0.04% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Containers/Packaging (-0.48% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| EPAC | GEF | EPAC / GEF | |
| Capitalization | 1.93B | 3.23B | 60% |
| EBITDA | 128M | 734M | 17% |
| Gain YTD | -10.075 | 8.408 | -120% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.10 | 11.81 | 221% |
| Revenue | 597M | 5.15B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 154M | 179M | 86% |
| Total Debt | 245M | 2.63B | 9% |
EPAC | GEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GEF's Valuation (30) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as EPAC (50) in the null industry. This means that GEF’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
GEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as EPAC (32) in the null industry. This means that GEF’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
GEF's SMR Rating (67) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAC (100) in the null industry. This means that GEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
GEF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAC (81) in the null industry. This means that GEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
GEF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is significantly better than the same rating for EPAC (100) in the null industry. This means that GEF’s stock grew significantly faster than EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
| EPAC | GEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 15 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
EPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| PH - EPAC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| DCI - EPAC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| ITT - EPAC | 68% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| FELE - EPAC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| GGG - EPAC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||
GEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEF has been loosely correlated with SLGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GEF jumps, then SLGN could also see price increases.