It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGDYN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GDYN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EPAM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +0.79% price change this week, while GDYN (@Information Technology Services) price change was -9.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.65%.
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
GDYN is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
EPAM | GDYN | EPAM / GDYN | |
Capitalization | 13.3B | 1.34B | 991% |
EBITDA | 622M | 12M | 5,183% |
Gain YTD | -20.868 | 21.905 | -95% |
P/E Ratio | 30.56 | 541.67 | 6% |
Revenue | 4.62B | 328M | 1,409% |
Total Cash | 1.85B | 231M | 800% |
Total Debt | 166M | 12.8M | 1,297% |
EPAM | GDYN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPAM's Valuation (66) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as GDYN (94) in the null industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to GDYN’s over the last 12 months.
GDYN's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as EPAM (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GDYN’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
EPAM's SMR Rating (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as GDYN (86) in the null industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to GDYN’s over the last 12 months.
GDYN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as EPAM (42) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GDYN’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
GDYN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (70) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GDYN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
EPAM | GDYN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago89% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago72% | 7 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago86% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NBREX | 28.15 | -0.20 | -0.71% |
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val Tr | |||
HWSCX | 62.11 | -0.52 | -0.83% |
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C | |||
MGRAX | 43.69 | -0.43 | -0.97% |
MFS International Growth A | |||
SSDAX | 33.89 | -0.70 | -2.02% |
DWS Small Cap Growth A | |||
LADFX | 24.36 | -0.52 | -2.09% |
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been loosely correlated with FLYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then FLYW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EPAM | 100% | -3.91% | ||
FLYW - EPAM | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
GLOB - EPAM | 57% Loosely correlated | -11.15% | ||
CTSH - EPAM | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.53% | ||
GDYN - EPAM | 44% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
ACN - EPAM | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDYN has been loosely correlated with EXLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDYN jumps, then EXLS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDYN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GDYN | 100% | -4.58% | ||
EXLS - GDYN | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
FLYW - GDYN | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
GLOB - GDYN | 48% Loosely correlated | -11.15% | ||
ASGN - GDYN | 46% Loosely correlated | -4.25% | ||
EPAM - GDYN | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.91% | ||
More |