Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EPGFX vs FKRCX
EPGFX vs FKRCX Comparison
Open Charts EPGFX vs FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals A
Price$30.06
Change+$0.16 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
EPGFX vs FKRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EPGFX vs. FKRCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPGFX is a Buy and FKRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKRCX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. EPGFX (354M). FKRCX pays higher dividends than EPGFX: FKRCX (8.48) vs EPGFX (7.07). EPGFX was incepted earlier than FKRCX: EPGFX (12 years) vs FKRCX (56 years). EPGFX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FKRCX (0.92). EPGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FKRCX (14.50). FKRCX initial investment is less costly to investors than EPGFX (5%) vs EPGFX (5%). FKRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EPGFX: FKRCX (1000) vs EPGFX (2500). FKRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 85.93 vs. EPGFX (62.94). FKRCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.71 vs. EPGFX (16.00).
| EPGFX | FKRCX | EPGFX / FKRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.92 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.92 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 58.243 | 73.233 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 354M | 1.62B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.07 | 8.48 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.94 | 85.93 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.97 | 105.72 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.00 | 49.71 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 261.16 | 291.20 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement