Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EPGFX vs FKRCX
EPGFX vs FKRCX Comparison
Open Charts EPGFX vs FKRCX
EPGFX vs FKRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EPGFX vs. FKRCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPGFX is a Hold and FKRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKRCX has more cash in the bank: 2.8B vs. EPGFX (513M). FKRCX pays higher dividends than EPGFX: FKRCX (11.95) vs EPGFX (7.32). EPGFX was incepted earlier than FKRCX: EPGFX (13 years) vs FKRCX (57 years). EPGFX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FKRCX (0.87). EPGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FKRCX (22.76). FKRCX initial investment is less costly to investors than EPGFX (5%) vs EPGFX (5%). FKRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EPGFX: FKRCX (1000) vs EPGFX (2500). FKRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.57 vs. EPGFX (35.11). FKRCX return over 5 years is better than : 152.78 vs. EPGFX (94.07).
| EPGFX | FKRCX | EPGFX / FKRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.87 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.87 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 57 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.709 | -11.140 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 82% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 2.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.32 | 11.95 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.11 | 53.57 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.58 | 202.48 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.07 | 152.78 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.63 | 213.48 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement