It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLPI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLPI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EPR (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while GLPI (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -4.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.
EPR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
GLPI is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| EPR | GLPI | EPR / GLPI | |
| Capitalization | 3.9B | 12.1B | 32% |
| EBITDA | 495M | 1.46B | 34% |
| Gain YTD | 22.363 | -6.696 | -334% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.48 | 15.35 | 146% |
| Revenue | 663M | 1.58B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 13.7M | 752M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 2.97B | 7.51B | 40% |
EPR | GLPI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 7 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GLPI's Valuation (15) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EPR (20). This means that GLPI’s stock grew similarly to EPR’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GLPI (25). This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to GLPI’s over the last 12 months.
GLPI's SMR Rating (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EPR (74). This means that GLPI’s stock grew similarly to EPR’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GLPI (72). This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to GLPI’s over the last 12 months.
EPR's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as GLPI (52). This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to GLPI’s over the last 12 months.
| EPR | GLPI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 10 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 2 days ago 46% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BRKC | 46.20 | 0.20 | +0.44% |
| YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Stgy ETF | |||
| IMTB | 44.23 | 0.08 | +0.18% |
| iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | |||
| FMUB | 51.19 | 0.03 | +0.05% |
| Fidelity Municipal Bond Opports ETF | |||
| ROAM | 28.63 | -0.24 | -0.84% |
| Hartford Multifactor Emerging Mkts ETF | |||
| PDP | 108.45 | -4.03 | -3.59% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLPI has been closely correlated with FCPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLPI jumps, then FCPT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLPI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLPI | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| FCPT - GLPI | 68% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| O - GLPI | 68% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| EPR - GLPI | 66% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| DOC - GLPI | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CUBE - GLPI | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||