Advertisement
EQH vs FGFPP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Buy and FGFPP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EQH’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileFGFPP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EQH’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- FGFPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EQH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGFPP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EQH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FGFPP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EQH (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.68% price change this week, while FGFPP (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
EQH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+0.93% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.45% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
| EQH | FGFPP | EQH / FGFPP | |
| Capitalization | 16.4B | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.031 | 33.789 | 53% |
| P/E Ratio | 42.51 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 14.8B | 13.3M | 111,278% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 10.4M | - |
| Total Debt | 6.44B | 3.42M | 188,414% |
EQH | FGFPP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FGFPP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as EQH (25) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGFPP’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.
EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGFPP (73) in the null industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGFPP’s over the last 12 months.
EQH's SMR Rating (12) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew significantly faster than FGFPP’s over the last 12 months.
FGFPP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as EQH (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGFPP’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.
EQH's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew significantly faster than FGFPP’s over the last 12 months.
| EQH | FGFPP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 7 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 66% | 12 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AIS | 30.51 | 0.78 | +2.61% |
| VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | |||
| ROBO | 63.94 | 1.34 | +2.14% |
| Robo Global® Robotics&Automation ETF | |||
| AOTG | 51.90 | 0.49 | +0.96% |
| AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | |||
| NJUL | 69.90 | 0.44 | +0.64% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Bfr ETF Jul | |||
| ILIT | 10.49 | -0.13 | -1.27% |
| iShares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | |||
EQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.
FGFPP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFPP and ORI have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFPP and ORI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGFPP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGFPP | 100% | N/A | ||
| ORI - FGFPP | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| EQH - FGFPP | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.26% | ||
| SLF - FGFPP | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| ACGL - FGFPP | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| DIISY - FGFPP | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||