EQH vs IWP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EQH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EQH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
EQH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EQH | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 67% | 14 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DEGO.X | 2.000088 | 0.122257 | +6.51% |
| Dego Finance cryptocurrency | |||
| CVC.X | 0.114268 | 0.002709 | +2.43% |
| Civic cryptocurrency | |||
| MEMX | 27.17 | -0.20 | -0.73% |
| Matthews Emerging Markets Ex Chn Act ETF | |||
| REP.X | 0.777452 | -0.014321 | -1.81% |
| Augur cryptocurrency | |||
| ENS.X | 13.660584 | -0.251536 | -1.81% |
| Ethereum Name Service cryptocurrency | |||
EQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| ARES - IWP | 81% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| APO - IWP | 80% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| KKR - IWP | 79% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| JEF - IWP | 78% Closely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| MKSI - IWP | 77% Closely correlated | -5.20% | ||
More | ||||