It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EQH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EQH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
EQH (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +0.17% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.
EQH is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
EQH | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 17 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EQH | RDVY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago71% | 7 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDVY has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RDVY jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDVY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RDVY | 100% | -0.93% | ||
HBAN - RDVY | 82% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
CMA - RDVY | 79% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
EQH - RDVY | 78% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
USB - RDVY | 78% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
PFG - RDVY | 77% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More |