EQS
Price
$1.87
Change
-$0.02 (-1.06%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
25.42M
ICMB
Price
$2.72
Change
+$0.03 (+1.12%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
39.21M
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQS vs ICMB

Header iconEQS vs ICMB Comparison
Open Charts EQS vs ICMBBanner chart's image
Equus Total Return
Price$1.87
Change-$0.02 (-1.06%)
Volume$96.21K
Capitalization25.42M
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
Price$2.72
Change+$0.03 (+1.12%)
Volume$15.67K
Capitalization39.21M
EQS vs ICMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQS vs. ICMB commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQS is a Hold and ICMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (EQS: $1.87 vs. ICMB: $2.72)
Brand notoriety: EQS and ICMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQS: 291% vs. ICMB: 65%
Market capitalization -- EQS: $25.42M vs. ICMB: $39.21M
EQS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $25.42M. ICMB’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $39.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileICMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ICMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EQS and ICMB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICMB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ICMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQS is a better buy in the short-term than ICMB.

Price Growth

EQS (@Investment Managers) experienced а +10.90% price change this week, while ICMB (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICMB($39.2M) has a higher market cap than EQS($25.4M). ICMB has higher P/E ratio than EQS: ICMB (9.07) vs EQS (1.69). EQS YTD gains are higher at: 70.100 vs. ICMB (-2.777). EQS has more cash in the bank: 2.48M vs. ICMB (1.75M). EQS has less debt than ICMB: EQS (1.59M) vs ICMB (120M). ICMB has higher revenues than EQS: ICMB (9.4M) vs EQS (-7.91M).
EQSICMBEQS / ICMB
Capitalization25.4M39.2M65%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD70.100-2.777-2,524%
P/E Ratio1.699.0719%
Revenue-7.91M9.4M-84%
Total Cash2.48M1.75M142%
Total Debt1.59M120M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQS vs ICMB: Fundamental Ratings
EQS
ICMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2570
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7751
SMR RATING
1..100
9678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3676
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5868
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICMB's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQS (89). This means that ICMB’s stock grew significantly faster than EQS’s over the last 12 months.

ICMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as EQS (77). This means that ICMB’s stock grew similarly to EQS’s over the last 12 months.

ICMB's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as EQS (96). This means that ICMB’s stock grew similarly to EQS’s over the last 12 months.

EQS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICMB (76). This means that EQS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICMB’s over the last 12 months.

EQS's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as ICMB (68). This means that EQS’s stock grew similarly to ICMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQSICMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HITI2.660.11
+4.31%
High Tide
SKYW116.50-0.17
-0.15%
SkyWest
PYPL69.23-0.15
-0.22%
PayPal Holdings
NSYS8.70-0.05
-0.57%
Nortech Systems
RES4.38-0.05
-1.13%
RPC

EQS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQS and CION have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQS and CION's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQS
1D Price
Change %
EQS100%
-1.00%
CION - EQS
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
ICMB - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
TSLX - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
ALTI - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
AMTD - EQS
20%
Poorly correlated
+13.53%
More

ICMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICMB has been loosely correlated with NMFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICMB jumps, then NMFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICMB
1D Price
Change %
ICMB100%
+1.12%
NMFC - ICMB
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
PTMN - ICMB
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
CION - ICMB
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
CGBD - ICMB
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
NCDL - ICMB
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More