ICMB
Price
$0.79
Change
-$0.05 (-5.95%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.34M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SEIC
Price
$102.40
Change
-$1.47 (-1.42%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.58B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICMB vs SEIC

ICMB vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICMB vs. SEIC commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICMB is a Hold and SEIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICMB vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
ICMB
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9080
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
9735
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5013

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICMB's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEIC (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that ICMB’s stock grew significantly faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for ICMB (100) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew significantly faster than ICMB’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (35) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICMB (97) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICMB’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICMB (81) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICMB’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ICMB (48) in the null industry. This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to ICMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICMBSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ICMB: $0.84 vs. SEIC: $103.87)
Brand notoriety: ICMB and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICMB: 18% vs. SEIC: 79%
Market capitalization -- ICMB: $12.34M vs. SEIC: $12.58B
ICMB [@Investment Managers] is valued at $12.34M. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $57 to $165.9B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICMB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ICMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than ICMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICMB is a better buy in the short-term than SEIC.

Price Growth

ICMB (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.59% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ICMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SEIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APTV43.970.95
+2.21%
Aptiv PLC
SNDA37.770.19
+0.51%
Sonida Senior Living
XCBEU10.90N/A
N/A
X3 Acquisition Corp Ltd
FNUC1.29-0.04
-3.01%
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc.
CYPH2.92-0.41
-12.31%
Cypherpunk Technologies Inc.

ICMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICMB and SEIC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICMB and SEIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICMB
1D Price
Change %
ICMB100%
+0.96%
SEIC - ICMB
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
SAR - ICMB
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
NEWT - ICMB
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
BCIC - ICMB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OXLCM - ICMB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More