It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EQX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXTGRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EQX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XTGRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EQX (@Precious Metals) experienced а -19.66% price change this week, while XTGRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.
EQX is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
EQX | XTGRF | EQX / XTGRF | |
Capitalization | 1.95B | 29.8M | 6,554% |
EBITDA | 291M | -1.51M | -19,295% |
Gain YTD | 9.407 | 62.542 | 15% |
P/E Ratio | 68.11 | 63.29 | 108% |
Revenue | 1.09B | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 285M | 10.5M | 2,714% |
Total Debt | 945M | N/A | - |
EQX | XTGRF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EQX's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XTGRF (92). This means that EQX’s stock grew somewhat faster than XTGRF’s over the last 12 months.
XTGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQX (100). This means that XTGRF’s stock grew significantly faster than EQX’s over the last 12 months.
EQX's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as XTGRF (80). This means that EQX’s stock grew similarly to XTGRF’s over the last 12 months.
XTGRF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EQX (53). This means that XTGRF’s stock grew similarly to EQX’s over the last 12 months.
XTGRF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQX (98). This means that XTGRF’s stock grew significantly faster than EQX’s over the last 12 months.
EQX | XTGRF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago51% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago78% | 10 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago71% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
EFZ | 16.90 | 0.42 | +2.55% |
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | |||
VCEB | 62.30 | -0.57 | -0.91% |
Vanguard ESG US Corporate Bond ETF | |||
GAUG | 35.12 | -0.46 | -1.29% |
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Aug | |||
FKU | 38.13 | -0.83 | -2.14% |
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
DFAI | 29.04 | -0.75 | -2.52% |
Dimensional International Cr Eq Mkt ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQX has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQX jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EQX | 100% | -2.37% | ||
AEM - EQX | 71% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
AGI - EQX | 70% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
KGC - EQX | 70% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
SILV - EQX | 69% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
PAAS - EQX | 69% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that XTGRF and AUHIF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XTGRF and AUHIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XTGRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XTGRF | 100% | +0.54% | ||
AUHIF - XTGRF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RNDXF - XTGRF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EGO - XTGRF | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.83% | ||
EQX - XTGRF | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.74% | ||
GOLD - XTGRF | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.50% | ||
More |