Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs RPMGX
ERASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs RPMGX
ERASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. ERASX (8.61B). ERASX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: ERASX (0.13) vs RPMGX (0.00). ERASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: ERASX (12 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). ERASX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. ERASX (13.00). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: RPMGX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.56 vs. ERASX (-8.47). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : -11.01 vs. RPMGX (-24.68).
| ERASX | RPMGX | ERASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.77 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.77 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.628 | -0.051 | -5,111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.61B | 21.1B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.47 | -6.56 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.17 | -1.58 | -327% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.01 | -24.68 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.32 | 28.29 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement