Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs RRMGX
ERASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$40.89
Change+$0.32 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$87.21
Change+$0.59 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.7B
ERASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jun 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Buy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. ERASX (14.2B). ERASX pays higher dividends than RRMGX: ERASX (0.21) vs RRMGX (0.00). ERASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ERASX (11 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than ERASX (0.81). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERASX (9.00). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: RRMGX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). ERASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.81 vs. RRMGX (-5.71). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 13.68 vs. RRMGX (-2.45).
| ERASX | RRMGX | ERASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.29 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.29 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.759 | -0.808 | 342% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 27.7B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | -5.71 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.09 | -0.10 | -6,881% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.68 | -2.45 | -558% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.64 | 12.36 | 426% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers