Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs RRMGX
ERASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$42.51
Change+$0.23 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.71
Change+$0.38 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
ERASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Buy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. ERASX (14.5B). ERASX pays higher dividends than RRMGX: ERASX (0.21) vs RRMGX (0.00). ERASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ERASX (11 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than ERASX (0.81). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERASX (9.00). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: RRMGX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). ERASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. RRMGX (-2.95). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 27.43 vs. RRMGX (2.39).
| ERASX | RRMGX | ERASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.29 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.29 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.094 | 2.036 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 28B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | -2.95 | -160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.52 | 11.65 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.43 | 2.39 | 1,150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.49 | 15.34 | 355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement