Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$25.51
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.01
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. ERLVX (1.34B). ERLVX (1.38) and RMFCX (1.37) have matching dividends . ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.70). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. ERLVX (-0.17). RMFCX (59.17) and ERLVX (57.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.558 | 2.924 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.37 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.17 | 5.22 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.84 | 18.48 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.04 | 59.17 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.12 | 61.78 | 67% |