Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$27.23
Change+$0.14 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. ERLVX (1.39B). RMFCX (1.20) and ERLVX (1.16) have matching dividends . ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.70). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. ERLVX (1.34). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. ERLVX (50.05).
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.665 | 13.689 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.20 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.34 | 4.96 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.56 | 38.79 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.05 | 57.10 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.91 | 91.18 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement