Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$27.00
Change-$0.14 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.89
Change-$0.48 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. ERLVX (1.41B). RMFCX (1.24) and ERLVX (1.21) have matching dividends . ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.70). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. ERLVX (4.07). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.19 vs. ERLVX (58.19).
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.309 | 12.543 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.07 | 6.02 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.40 | 40.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.19 | 62.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.62 | 103.10 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement