Ad is loading...
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R6
Price$24.47
Change+$0.33 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. ERLVX (1.42B). RMFCX (1.34) and ERLVX (1.32) have matching dividends . ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.71). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. ERLVX (-3.17). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.30 vs. ERLVX (50.08).
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.768 | -1.247 | 462% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 97.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.34 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.17 | 3.87 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.79 | 9.64 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.08 | 54.30 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.42 | 55.97 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...