Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ERLVX (1.45B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ERLVX: RMFCX (1.16) vs ERLVX (0.94). ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.71). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). ERLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.59 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. ERLVX (33.01).
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.340 | 9.137 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.16 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.59 | 8.88 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.85 | 34.84 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.01 | 37.23 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.54 | 91.06 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers