Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ERLVX (1.45B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ERLVX: RMFCX (1.19) vs ERLVX (0.98). ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.71). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). ERLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. RMFCX (10.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.58 vs. ERLVX (31.45).
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.913 | 6.522 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.19 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | 10.30 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | 35.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.45 | 36.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.62 | 96.37 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement