Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ERLVX (1.45B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ERLVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs ERLVX (0.91). ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.71). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). ERLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.74 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX (37.08) and ERLVX (35.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.290 | 9.496 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.15 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.74 | 9.09 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.02 | 33.16 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.96 | 37.08 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.96 | 92.36 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement