Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ERLVX vs RMFCX
ERLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ERLVX (1.51B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ERLVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs ERLVX (0.89). ERLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ERLVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ERLVX (0.71). ERLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERLVX: RMFCX (250) vs ERLVX (5000000). ERLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. RMFCX (4.75). ERLVX (36.53) and RMFCX (35.61) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ERLVX | RMFCX | ERLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.819 | 8.539 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.15 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 4.75 | 377% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.42 | 35.38 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.53 | 35.61 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.57 | 94.16 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement