Ad is loading...
ERSGX vs WCMLX
ERSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ERSGX vs WCMLX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap R
Price$14.91
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.68M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.78
Change+$0.21 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.34M
ERSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERSGX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERSGX has more cash in the bank: 171M vs. WCMLX (42.3M). ERSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ERSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ERSGX (16 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. ERSGX (42.00). ERSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ERSGX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). ERSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.55 vs. WCMLX (10.78). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 28.63 vs. ERSGX (20.02).
| ERSGX | WCMLX | ERSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.776 | 5.521 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171M | 42.3M | 404% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.55 | 10.78 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.15 | 10.33 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.02 | 28.63 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.22 | N/A | - |