Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERSGX vs WCMLX
ERSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ERSGX vs WCMLX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap R
Price$14.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.69M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
ERSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERSGX has more cash in the bank: 180M vs. WCMLX (45M). ERSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: ERSGX (0.09) vs WCMLX (0.00). ERSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ERSGX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ERSGX (1.61). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ERSGX (38.00). ERSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ERSGX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. ERSGX (1.50). ERSGX (23.01) and WCMLX (22.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ERSGX | WCMLX | ERSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.99 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.79 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.208 | 6.610 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 45M | 400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | 7.61 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.94 | 29.46 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.01 | 22.08 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement