Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERSGX vs WCMLX
ERSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ERSGX vs WCMLX
ERSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERSGX has more cash in the bank: 132M vs. WCMLX (51.9M). ERSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ERSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ERSGX (17 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ERSGX (1.64). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. ERSGX (58.00). ERSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ERSGX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. ERSGX (-4.46). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. ERSGX (-13.28).
| ERSGX | WCMLX | ERSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.99 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.79 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.790 | 11.410 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 51.9M | 254% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.46 | 17.02 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.07 | 32.50 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.28 | 3.16 | -420% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement