ERVFF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.96M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FKMCF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
20.64M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ERVFF vs FKMCF

Header iconERVFF vs FKMCF Comparison
Open Charts ERVFF vs FKMCFBanner chart's image
Boron One Holdings
Price$0.03
Change-$0.02 (-40.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization7.96M
FOKUS MNG
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$89K
Capitalization20.64M
ERVFF vs FKMCF Comparison Chart in %
ERVFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FKMCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ERVFF vs. FKMCF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERVFF is a Hold and FKMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ERVFF: $0.03 vs. FKMCF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: ERVFF and FKMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ERVFF: 1% vs. FKMCF: 350%
Market capitalization -- ERVFF: $7.96M vs. FKMCF: $20.64M
ERVFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.96M. FKMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $20.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ERVFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFKMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ERVFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FKMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ERVFF and FKMCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ERVFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKMCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ERVFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FKMCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ERVFF and FKMCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ERVFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -27.88% price change this week, while FKMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +98.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.01% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKMCF($20.6M) has a higher market cap than ERVFF($7.96M). FKMCF YTD gains are higher at: 35.492 vs. ERVFF (-18.100). FKMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -674.21K vs. ERVFF (-874K). FKMCF has more cash in the bank: 1.27M vs. ERVFF (33.2K). ERVFF (0) and FKMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ERVFFFKMCFERVFF / FKMCF
Capitalization7.96M20.6M39%
EBITDA-874K-674.21K130%
Gain YTD-18.10035.492-51%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash33.2K1.27M3%
Total Debt127KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERVFF vs FKMCF: Fundamental Ratings
ERVFF
FKMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3184
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3730

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ERVFF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKMCF (85). This means that ERVFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKMCF’s over the last 12 months.

FKMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ERVFF (100). This means that FKMCF’s stock grew similarly to ERVFF’s over the last 12 months.

FKMCF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as ERVFF (90). This means that FKMCF’s stock grew similarly to ERVFF’s over the last 12 months.

ERVFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FKMCF (42). This means that ERVFF’s stock grew similarly to FKMCF’s over the last 12 months.

FKMCF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ERVFF (100). This means that FKMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ERVFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ERVFFFKMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERVFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FKMCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LPCN3.230.23
+7.67%
Lipocine
INDV32.250.87
+2.77%
Indivior PLC
FSUN30.790.63
+2.09%
FirstSun Capital Bancorp
FICO1724.97-35.28
-2.00%
Fair Isaac Corp
AIIO0.54-0.03
-5.08%
Roboai Inc

ERVFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ERVFF and TGOLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERVFF and TGOLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERVFF
1D Price
Change %
ERVFF100%
-27.88%
TGOLF - ERVFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+39.69%
FKMCF - ERVFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
SGPTF - ERVFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
MTLFF - ERVFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.68%
ESKYF - ERVFF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
More

FKMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKMCF and WESMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKMCF and WESMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKMCF
1D Price
Change %
FKMCF100%
+2.90%
WESMF - FKMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDDYF - FKMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-13.16%
ERVFF - FKMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-27.88%
ASMMF - FKMCF
18%
Poorly correlated
-13.47%
AAGFF - FKMCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
More