It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFLT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESAB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFLT’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -3.83% price change this week, while GFLT (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +4.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -4.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.85%.
ESAB is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
ESAB | GFLT | ESAB / GFLT | |
Capitalization | 7.49B | 65.2M | 11,485% |
EBITDA | 520M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 49.836 | -87.700 | -57% |
P/E Ratio | 27.84 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.76B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 254M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1.17B | N/A | - |
ESAB | GFLT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago48% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago23% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago23% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago76% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago55% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESAB | 100% | -0.77% | ||
MLI - ESAB | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
WOR - ESAB | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
IIIN - ESAB | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
NWPX - ESAB | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
RS - ESAB | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.69% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFLT has been loosely correlated with BEKSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFLT jumps, then BEKSF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GFLT | 100% | N/A | ||
BEKSF - GFLT | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
RMTO - GFLT | 2% Poorly correlated | -12.56% | ||
CMPO - GFLT | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
ESAB - GFLT | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
CHTM - GFLT | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |