ESAB
Price
$125.45
Change
+$0.53 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.61B
27 days until earnings call
NWPX
Price
$42.78
Change
+$0.44 (+1.04%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
422.58M
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESAB vs NWPX

Header iconESAB vs NWPX Comparison
Open Charts ESAB vs NWPXBanner chart's image
ESAB
Price$125.45
Change+$0.53 (+0.42%)
Volume$153.73K
Capitalization7.61B
NWPX Infrastructure
Price$42.78
Change+$0.44 (+1.04%)
Volume$28.27K
Capitalization422.58M
ESAB vs NWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWPX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESAB vs. NWPX commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESAB is a Buy and NWPX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ESAB: $125.45 vs. NWPX: $42.78)
Brand notoriety: ESAB and NWPX are both not notable
ESAB represents the Metal Fabrication, while NWPX is part of the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESAB: 56% vs. NWPX: 50%
Market capitalization -- ESAB: $7.61B vs. NWPX: $422.58M
ESAB [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $7.61B. NWPX’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $422.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $31.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.41B. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWPX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ESAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NWPX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ESAB and NWPX are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESAB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWPX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESAB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWPX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ESAB and NWPX are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +3.52% price change this week, while NWPX (@Steel) price change was +4.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESAB is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

NWPX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+1.82% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

@Steel (+2.31% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESAB($7.61B) has a higher market cap than NWPX($423M). ESAB has higher P/E ratio than NWPX: ESAB (26.03) vs NWPX (13.08). ESAB YTD gains are higher at: 4.752 vs. NWPX (-11.355). ESAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 515M vs. NWPX (64M). ESAB has more cash in the bank: 47.1M vs. NWPX (5.29M). NWPX has less debt than ESAB: NWPX (129M) vs ESAB (1.16B). ESAB has higher revenues than NWPX: ESAB (2.73B) vs NWPX (495M).
ESABNWPXESAB / NWPX
Capitalization7.61B423M1,798%
EBITDA515M64M805%
Gain YTD4.752-11.355-42%
P/E Ratio26.0313.08199%
Revenue2.73B495M551%
Total Cash47.1M5.29M891%
Total Debt1.16B129M898%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWPX: Fundamental Ratings
NWPX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESABNWPX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWPX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAMTX24.580.21
+0.86%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R5
PNDZF151.85N/A
N/A
Pandora A/S
CROMF11.00N/A
N/A
Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust
FHELF0.02N/A
N/A
FIRST HELIUM INC
QTRHF1.00-0.04
-3.47%
Quarterhill Inc.

ESAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESAB
1D Price
Change %
ESAB100%
+1.10%
MLI - ESAB
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
CRS - ESAB
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
NWPX - ESAB
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
IIIN - ESAB
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
PRLB - ESAB
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More

NWPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWPX has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWPX jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWPX
1D Price
Change %
NWPX100%
+1.04%
ESAB - NWPX
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
PRLB - NWPX
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
ZEUS - NWPX
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
MATW - NWPX
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
CRS - NWPX
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
More