ESEA
Price
$34.08
Change
+$0.99 (+2.99%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
60 days until earnings call
SFL
Price
$9.76
Change
+$0.04 (+0.41%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
53 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ESEA vs SFL

Header iconESEA vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts ESEA vs SFLBanner chart's image
Euroseas
Price$34.08
Change+$0.99 (+2.99%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
SFL
Price$9.76
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
Volume$33.92K
CapitalizationN/A
ESEA vs SFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ESEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESEA vs. SFL commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESEA is a Hold and SFL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (ESEA: $34.22 vs. SFL: $9.74)
Brand notoriety: ESEA and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESEA: 144% vs. SFL: 309%
Market capitalization -- ESEA: $240M vs. SFL: $1.3B
ESEA [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $240M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $30.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESEA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESEA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESEA is a better buy in the long-term than SFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESEA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ESEA and SFL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ESEA (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -4.17% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was -3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

SFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-3.75% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFL($1.31B) has a higher market cap than ESEA($240M). SFL has higher P/E ratio than ESEA: SFL (9.74) vs ESEA (2.10). ESEA YTD gains are higher at: 16.840 vs. SFL (-5.488). ESEA has less debt than SFL: ESEA (218M) vs SFL (2.82B).
ESEASFLESEA / SFL
Capitalization240M1.31B18%
EBITDAN/A529M-
Gain YTD16.840-5.488-307%
P/E Ratio2.109.7422%
RevenueN/A822M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt218M2.82B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESEA vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
ESEA
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1477
SMR RATING
1..100
2261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6476
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8292
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFL's Valuation (8) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ESEA (11). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to ESEA’s over the last 12 months.

ESEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFL (77). This means that ESEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFL’s over the last 12 months.

ESEA's SMR Rating (22) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFL (61). This means that ESEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFL’s over the last 12 months.

ESEA's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (76). This means that ESEA’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

ESEA's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (92). This means that ESEA’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESEASFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ESEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTCCX14.450.19
+1.33%
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity C
SVXAX51.890.40
+0.78%
Smead International Value A
GTDDX33.090.23
+0.70%
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap A
PDFDX50.58N/A
N/A
Perkins Discovery
JBATX29.25N/A
N/A
JHancock Balanced R2

ESEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESEA has been loosely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESEA jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESEA
1D Price
Change %
ESEA100%
+3.41%
GSL - ESEA
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
CMRE - ESEA
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
SB - ESEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
ASC - ESEA
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
ZIM - ESEA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
+0.21%
ASC - SFL
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
SB - SFL
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
ECO - SFL
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
NMM - SFL
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
CMRE - SFL
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More