Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends A
Price$22.20
Change-$0.12 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets915.91M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.69
Change-$0.39 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. ESGMX (916M). ESGMX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ESGMX (0.11) vs NPFCX (0.00). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGMX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ESGMX (1.24). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGMX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. ESGMX (5.61). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.00 vs. ESGMX (26.24).
| ESGMX | NPFCX | ESGMX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.48 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.48 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.217 | 18.636 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 916M | 164B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | 12.74 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.30 | 60.09 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.24 | 31.00 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement