Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends A
Price$21.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets962.98M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. ESGMX (963M). ESGMX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ESGMX (0.11) vs NPFCX (0.00). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGMX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ESGMX (1.24). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGMX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.56 vs. ESGMX (2.05). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.82 vs. ESGMX (23.52).
| ESGMX | NPFCX | ESGMX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.48 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.48 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.000 | 14.663 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 963M | 159B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 10.56 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.67 | 39.19 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.52 | 25.82 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.49 | - |