Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFCX
Mirova Global Megatrends A
Price$21.25
Change+$0.16 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets898.08M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$65.30
Change+$0.41 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.52B
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. ESGMX (898M). ESGMX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ESGMX (0.11) vs NPFCX (0.00). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGMX (9 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ESGMX (1.24). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. ESGMX (18.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.53 vs. ESGMX (2.80). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.32 vs. ESGMX (27.75).
| ESGMX | NPFCX | ESGMX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.48 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.48 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.033 | 12.781 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 898M | 156B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 10.53 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.77 | 43.48 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.75 | 35.32 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement