Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. ESGMX (651M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than ESGMX: NPFCX (0.33) vs ESGMX (0.14). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGMX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than ESGMX (1.26). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ESGMX (21.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. ESGMX (4.89). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. ESGMX (3.80).
| ESGMX | NPFCX | ESGMX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.47 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.47 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.058 | 6.075 | -34% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 651M | 172B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.33 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 12.12 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.54 | 37.44 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.80 | 11.16 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.48 | 111.02 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers