Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts ESGMX vs NPFCX
ESGMX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ESGMX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESGMX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. ESGMX (667M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than ESGMX: NPFCX (0.33) vs ESGMX (0.14). ESGMX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: ESGMX (10 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than ESGMX (1.26). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ESGMX (21.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: NPFCX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. ESGMX (5.71). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.35 vs. ESGMX (8.13).
| ESGMX | NPFCX | ESGMX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.47 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.47 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.229 | 6.915 | -3% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 667M | 164B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.33 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 12.68 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.51 | 39.88 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.13 | 14.35 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.97 | 102.83 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement