Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESMAX vs TRZPX
ESMAX vs TRZPX Comparison
Open Charts ESMAX vs TRZPX
ESMAX vs TRZPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZPX has more cash in the bank: 874M vs. ESMAX (171M). ESMAX pays higher dividends than TRZPX: ESMAX (2.99) vs TRZPX (2.68). ESMAX was incepted earlier than TRZPX: ESMAX (26 years) vs TRZPX (5 years). ESMAX (1.44) is less costly to investors than TRZPX (0.84). ESMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. TRZPX (52.80). TRZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESMAX: TRZPX (0) vs ESMAX (1000). TRZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.01 vs. ESMAX (-14.14). TRZPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.93 vs. ESMAX (-2.93).
| ESMAX | TRZPX | ESMAX / TRZPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.84 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.108 | 6.006 | 268% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171M | 874M | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 2.68 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.14 | 0.01 | -271,892% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.50 | 16.68 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.93 | 7.93 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers