It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESMC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESMC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESMC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +44.44% price change this week, while MDT (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +2.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.28%.
MDT is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
ESMC | MDT | ESMC / MDT | |
Capitalization | 2.89M | 119B | 0% |
EBITDA | 687K | 9.22B | 0% |
Gain YTD | 210.757 | 17.155 | 1,229% |
P/E Ratio | 7.80 | 25.51 | 31% |
Revenue | 12.9M | 33.5B | 0% |
Total Cash | 541K | 8.97B | 0% |
Total Debt | 516K | 28.5B | 0% |
ESMC | MDT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 17 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDT's Valuation (12) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESMC (83). This means that MDT’s stock grew significantly faster than ESMC’s over the last 12 months.
ESMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as MDT (84). This means that ESMC’s stock grew similarly to MDT’s over the last 12 months.
ESMC's SMR Rating (36) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDT (71). This means that ESMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDT’s over the last 12 months.
ESMC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as MDT (36). This means that ESMC’s stock grew similarly to MDT’s over the last 12 months.
MDT's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ESMC (95). This means that MDT’s stock grew similarly to ESMC’s over the last 12 months.
ESMC | MDT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago42% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago41% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago50% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago47% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago78% | 6 days ago49% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago73% | 1 day ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago35% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ESMC and MDRSF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESMC and MDRSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESMC | 100% | N/A | ||
MDRSF - ESMC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MASI - ESMC | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
FONR - ESMC | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
MDT - ESMC | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
HBIO - ESMC | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
More |