Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESMCX vs TRZPX
ESMCX vs TRZPX Comparison
Open Charts ESMCX vs TRZPX
ESMCX vs TRZPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZPX has more cash in the bank: 875M vs. ESMCX (177M). ESMCX (2.73) and TRZPX (2.69) have matching dividends . ESMCX was incepted earlier than TRZPX: ESMCX (26 years) vs TRZPX (5 years). ESMCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than TRZPX (0.84). ESMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. TRZPX (52.80). TRZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESMCX: TRZPX (0) vs ESMCX (1000). TRZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.61 vs. ESMCX (-13.22). TRZPX return over 5 years is better than : 9.38 vs. ESMCX (-7.13).
| ESMCX | TRZPX | ESMCX / TRZPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.84 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.705 | 6.006 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 875M | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 2.69 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.22 | 3.61 | -367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 22.60 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.13 | 9.38 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement