Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ESMSX vs TRZPX
ESMSX vs TRZPX Comparison
Open Charts ESMSX vs TRZPX
ESMSX vs TRZPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZPX has more cash in the bank: 890M vs. ESMSX (164M). ESMSX pays higher dividends than TRZPX: ESMSX (3.42) vs TRZPX (2.62). ESMSX was incepted earlier than TRZPX: ESMSX (9 years) vs TRZPX (5 years). ESMSX (1.10) is less costly to investors than TRZPX (0.84). ESMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. TRZPX (52.80). TRZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESMSX: TRZPX (0) vs ESMSX (1000000). TRZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. ESMSX (-14.14). TRZPX return over 5 years is better than : 9.46 vs. ESMSX (-5.12).
| ESMSX | TRZPX | ESMSX / TRZPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.84 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.272 | 8.666 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 890M | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.62 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.14 | 6.90 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.14 | 21.28 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.12 | 9.46 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers