Investors tracking the U.S. housing finance sector frequently encounter two prominent names: Essent Group Ltd. and Radian Group Inc. Both companies are leading providers of private mortgage insurance (PMI) — a product that enables homebuyers to secure mortgages with down payments below 20% by protecting lenders against borrower default. While they share a core business, their corporate strategies have diverged materially over the past year. Essent has emphasized capital discipline, shareholder returns, and incremental diversification. Radian, meanwhile, has embarked on a bold transformation through a major acquisition and a planned exit from several ancillary businesses. This comparison examines how these two mortgage insurers stack up across multiple dimensions relevant to traders and long-term investors alike.
ESNT, the parent company of Essent Group Ltd., is a Bermuda-based holding company offering private mortgage insurance, mortgage reinsurance, and title insurance and settlement services. In recent quarters, Essent has demonstrated remarkable earnings consistency despite a subdued housing origination environment. For the full year 2025, the company reported net income of $690 million, or $6.90 per diluted share. Its mortgage insurance in force stood at $248.4 billion at year-end 2025, supported by a persistency rate of approximately 86%, which reflects the tendency of borrowers with low-rate mortgages to hold onto their policies longer.
Essent's credit profile strengthened further when Moody's upgraded the insurance financial strength rating of Essent Guaranty to A2 from A3 in mid-2025. The company has also been an aggressive buyer of its own shares, repurchasing approximately 9.9 million shares for $576 million during 2025 — retiring nearly 10% of its outstanding shares. In early 2026, Essent increased its quarterly dividend to $0.35 per share, marking the sixth consecutive year of dividend growth. On the diversification front, Essent Re has begun expanding into property and casualty reinsurance through quota share agreements backed by Lloyd's, though management has characterized this as a measured, long-term initiative rather than an immediate earnings catalyst. One area of emerging caution: Essent's default rate has edged upward from 2.12% in mid-2025 to approximately 2.54% by early 2026, reflecting portfolio seasoning rather than acute credit stress.
RDN, Radian Group Inc., is a Pennsylvania-based provider of private mortgage insurance and risk management solutions. In the past year, Radian's story has been defined far more by strategic transformation than by steady-state operations. For the full year 2025, Radian reported net income from continuing operations of $618 million, or $4.39 per diluted share. Its primary mortgage insurance in force reached an all-time high of $282.5 billion by year-end 2025, with new insurance written for the year totaling approximately $55.2 billion — a notable increase from $52 billion in 2024.
The biggest development, however, was Radian's completion of the $1.67 billion acquisition of Inigo Limited, a Lloyd's of London specialty insurer, in February 2026. The deal, funded entirely with available liquidity and without issuing new equity, is designed to transform Radian from a U.S.-focused mortgage insurer into a global, multi-line specialty insurer. Management projects the acquisition will double annual revenues and generate mid-teens percentage accretion to earnings per share (EPS) in the first full year. Concurrently, Radian is divesting its Mortgage Conduit, Title, and Real Estate Services businesses, with completion expected by late 2026. The company returned $576 million to shareholders in 2025 through dividends ($0.255 per share quarterly) and share repurchases (13.5 million shares for $430 million). Book value per share grew 13% year-over-year to $35.29, though post-acquisition holding-company liquidity declined to approximately $350 million, warranting close monitoring.
In a market environment where mortgage insurance stocks are navigating divergent strategies and macroeconomic crosscurrents, traders increasingly turn to automated tools for data-driven decision-making. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from a library of hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across stocks, ETFs, forex, and crypto. These bots employ varied trading styles — from short-term 5-minute and 15-minute agents to longer-duration swing and trend-following strategies — and have posted annualized returns that can range from double-digit percentages to well over 200% in select cases, depending on market conditions and strategy parameters. Each bot is presented with transparent statistics including Sharpe ratio, drawdown history, trade frequency, and closed profit-and-loss records, enabling traders to evaluate strategies against their own risk tolerance. Only bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a spot in this section. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to discover AI-driven strategies suited to today's conditions.
When comparing ESNT and RDN, several contrasts stand out. On portfolio scale, Radian holds the larger mortgage insurance-in-force book — $282.5 billion versus Essent's $248.4 billion — and has been writing more new insurance, with approximately $55.2 billion in new insurance written (NIW) during 2025 compared to Essent's roughly $48.5 billion. On profitability, however, Essent has maintained a clear edge: its net margin exceeds 50%, while Radian's net margin from continuing operations runs closer to 27%. Essent's operating margin of approximately 59% also outpaces Radian's roughly 47%.
Capital management approaches differ meaningfully. Essent has prioritized aggressive buybacks, retiring nearly 10% of outstanding shares in 2025 alone, and has steadily raised its dividend for six consecutive years. Radian has also returned significant capital — $576 million in 2025 — but is now prioritizing balance sheet repair following the Inigo acquisition, with full resumption of share repurchases likely to be opportunistic rather than programmatic in the near term. Book value per share tells a similar story: Essent ended 2025 at $60.31, well above Radian's $35.29, though Radian's book value grew faster year-over-year at 13% versus Essent's roughly 13% as well.
Risk profiles have diverged sharply. Essent's risks are primarily macro-driven — housing affordability, rising defaults, and slower origination volumes. Radian carries those same macro risks plus meaningful execution risk tied to integrating Inigo, which operates in an entirely different market (Lloyd's specialty insurance) with different regulatory, underwriting, and competitive dynamics. The integration is expected to be manageable — management has described the execution risk as "fairly low" — but the $1.67 billion price tag and the resulting decline in holding-company liquidity introduce a degree of financial leverage that Essent simply does not carry.
On the other hand, Radian offers a more compelling growth narrative. The Inigo acquisition is projected to deliver approximately $170 million in incremental pre-tax income, with mid-teens returns through the cycle, and the divestiture of non-core businesses should streamline focus. Essent's growth story is more incremental, relying on persistency, investment income, and a slow-build reinsurance expansion rather than a single transformative catalyst.
Based on observable trends, relative positioning, and the nature of each company's risk-reward profile, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward ESNT as the more consistent candidate under current market conditions. The rationale centers on trend stability rather than headline growth potential. Essent's higher net margins, stronger persistency rate (approximately 86% versus Radian's 82%), superior credit rating trajectory, and aggressive capital return program make its earnings stream more predictable in an environment where housing affordability and elevated mortgage rates continue to weigh on origination activity. Essent's measured reinsurance expansion and investment income tailwinds provide incremental upside without the integration complexity or balance-sheet strain that Radian must now navigate. While Radian's Inigo acquisition could prove transformative and accretive over a multi-year horizon, AI-driven analysis tends to favor cleaner, more stable operating profiles when near-term macro uncertainty remains elevated. That said, Radian's larger insurance-in-force base and higher new-insurance-written volumes suggest it would likely receive more favorable treatment if housing market conditions were to improve materially. In this environment, Essent's combination of capital discipline, earnings quality, and lower execution risk gives it a modest edge.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRDN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESNT (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +4.18% price change this week, while RDN (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -5.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -4.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.50%.
ESNT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
RDN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
| ESNT | RDN | ESNT / RDN | |
| Capitalization | 6.18B | 4.93B | 125% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.999 | 4.133 | 169% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.58 | 9.11 | 105% |
| Revenue | 1.31B | 1.37B | 95% |
| Total Cash | 6.18B | 6.89B | 90% |
| Total Debt | 496M | 1.3B | 38% |
ESNT | RDN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RDN's Valuation (45) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as ESNT (74). This means that RDN’s stock grew similarly to ESNT’s over the last 12 months.
RDN's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as ESNT (20). This means that RDN’s stock grew similarly to ESNT’s over the last 12 months.
ESNT's SMR Rating (68) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as RDN (72). This means that ESNT’s stock grew similarly to RDN’s over the last 12 months.
ESNT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as RDN (52). This means that ESNT’s stock grew similarly to RDN’s over the last 12 months.
ESNT's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as RDN (43). This means that ESNT’s stock grew similarly to RDN’s over the last 12 months.
| ESNT | RDN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SOUX | 16.11 | 3.35 | +26.27% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SOUN ETF | |||
| ISCG | 65.50 | 0.99 | +1.53% |
| iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| ECNS | 29.49 | 0.39 | +1.34% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | |||
| VTV | 224.31 | 0.94 | +0.42% |
| Vanguard Morn Value ETF | |||
| SABA | 8.34 | -0.04 | -0.49% |
| Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESNT has been closely correlated with MTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESNT jumps, then MTG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESNT | 100% | +4.90% | ||
| MTG - ESNT | 84% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ACT - ESNT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| RDN - ESNT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| AIZ - ESNT | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| FNF - ESNT | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.49% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDN has been closely correlated with ESNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RDN jumps, then ESNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDN | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| ESNT - RDN | 75% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| MTG - RDN | 71% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ACT - RDN | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| AIZ - RDN | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| ITIC - RDN | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
More | ||||