ESOA
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.13 (-1.30%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
165.51M
11 days until earnings call
HOCFF
Price
$229.25
Change
+$4.25 (+1.89%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
17.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESOA vs HOCFF

Header iconESOA vs HOCFF Comparison
Open Charts ESOA vs HOCFFBanner chart's image
Energy Services of America
Price$9.90
Change-$0.13 (-1.30%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization165.51M
Hochtief AG
Price$229.25
Change+$4.25 (+1.89%)
Volume$22
Capitalization17.07B
ESOA vs HOCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESOA vs. HOCFF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESOA is a Buy and HOCFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ESOA: $10.15 vs. HOCFF: $229.25)
Brand notoriety: ESOA and HOCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESOA: 53% vs. HOCFF: 4%
Market capitalization -- ESOA: $165.51M vs. HOCFF: $17.07B
ESOA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $165.51M. HOCFF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $17.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESOA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHOCFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ESOA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HOCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOCFF is a better buy in the long-term than ESOA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESOA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOCFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESOA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HOCFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOCFF is a better buy in the short-term than ESOA.

Price Growth

ESOA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -6.88% price change this week, while HOCFF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +483.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESOA is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.46% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOCFF($17.1B) has a higher market cap than ESOA($166M). HOCFF has higher P/E ratio than ESOA: HOCFF (19.41) vs ESOA (9.08). HOCFF YTD gains are higher at: 69.188 vs. ESOA (-19.081). HOCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.42B vs. ESOA (37M). ESOA has less debt than HOCFF: ESOA (53.2M) vs HOCFF (668M). HOCFF has higher revenues than ESOA: HOCFF (37B) vs ESOA (368M).
ESOAHOCFFESOA / HOCFF
Capitalization166M17.1B1%
EBITDA37M2.42B2%
Gain YTD-19.08169.188-28%
P/E Ratio9.0819.4147%
Revenue368M37B1%
Total CashN/A5.83B-
Total Debt53.2M668M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESOA vs HOCFF: Fundamental Ratings
ESOA
HOCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4715
SMR RATING
1..100
2213
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ESOA's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as HOCFF (65). This means that ESOA’s stock grew similarly to HOCFF’s over the last 12 months.

HOCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as ESOA (47). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

HOCFF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as ESOA (22). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

HOCFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ESOA (51). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

HOCFF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESOA (78). This means that HOCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESOAHOCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYBCF0.080.02
+23.81%
Cybeats Technologies Corp.
AJINY26.590.09
+0.36%
Ajinomoto Co., Inc.
HKUOY15.97N/A
N/A
Hakuhodo Dy Holdings, Inc.
LGSXY1.05N/A
N/A
Light S.A.
AAUGF0.03N/A
-3.85%
AERO ENERGY LTD.

ESOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESOA has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESOA jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESOA
1D Price
Change %
ESOA100%
+1.20%
MTZ - ESOA
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.04%
STRL - ESOA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
PWR - ESOA
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
EME - ESOA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
FIX - ESOA
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

HOCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOCFF and AGFY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOCFF and AGFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOCFF
1D Price
Change %
HOCFF100%
+1.89%
AGFY - HOCFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
ACSAY - HOCFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
EFGSY - HOCFF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
EFGSF - HOCFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESOA - HOCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More