ESVIF
Price
$1.74
Change
-$0.04 (-2.25%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
321.23M
PTEN
Price
$5.66
Change
+$0.16 (+2.91%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.12B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESVIF vs PTEN

Header iconESVIF vs PTEN Comparison
Open Charts ESVIF vs PTENBanner chart's image
Ensign Energy Services
Price$1.74
Change-$0.04 (-2.25%)
Volume$97.72K
Capitalization321.23M
Patterson-UTI Energy
Price$5.66
Change+$0.16 (+2.91%)
Volume$8.9K
Capitalization2.12B
ESVIF vs PTEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ESVIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESVIF vs. PTEN commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESVIF is a StrongBuy and PTEN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ESVIF: $1.74 vs. PTEN: $5.50)
Brand notoriety: ESVIF and PTEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESVIF: 269% vs. PTEN: 70%
Market capitalization -- ESVIF: $321.23M vs. PTEN: $2.12B
ESVIF [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $321.23M. PTEN’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $2.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $4.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESVIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePTEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESVIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PTEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESVIF is a better buy in the long-term than PTEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESVIF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTEN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESVIF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PTEN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESVIF is a better buy in the short-term than PTEN.

Price Growth

ESVIF (@Contract Drilling) experienced а +3.69% price change this week, while PTEN (@Contract Drilling) price change was -0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

PTEN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (-0.93% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PTEN($2.12B) has a higher market cap than ESVIF($321M). PTEN has higher P/E ratio than ESVIF: PTEN (51.00) vs ESVIF (14.51). ESVIF YTD gains are higher at: -15.534 vs. PTEN (-30.826). ESVIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 389M vs. PTEN (91.2M). PTEN has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. ESVIF (15M). ESVIF has less debt than PTEN: ESVIF (998M) vs PTEN (1.29B). PTEN has higher revenues than ESVIF: PTEN (5.02B) vs ESVIF (1.67B).
ESVIFPTENESVIF / PTEN
Capitalization321M2.12B15%
EBITDA389M91.2M427%
Gain YTD-15.534-30.82650%
P/E Ratio14.5151.0028%
Revenue1.67B5.02B33%
Total Cash15M184M8%
Total Debt998M1.29B78%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESVIF vs PTEN: Fundamental Ratings
ESVIF
PTEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
226
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6686
SMR RATING
1..100
9397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4983
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
292
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PTEN's Valuation (61) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as ESVIF (62) in the null industry. This means that PTEN’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.

ESVIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as PTEN (86) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that ESVIF’s stock grew similarly to PTEN’s over the last 12 months.

ESVIF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as PTEN (97) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that ESVIF’s stock grew similarly to PTEN’s over the last 12 months.

ESVIF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTEN (83) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that ESVIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTEN’s over the last 12 months.

PTEN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as ESVIF (29) in the null industry. This means that PTEN’s stock grew similarly to ESVIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESVIFPTEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESVIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHIX37.24N/A
N/A
Hartford Healthcare I
CDIVX12.77N/A
N/A
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund Class I
MTCLX82.08N/A
N/A
MFS Technology R6
NWZMX22.65N/A
N/A
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
WFMDX49.39N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Admin

ESVIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESVIF has been loosely correlated with PDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESVIF jumps, then PDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESVIF
1D Price
Change %
ESVIF100%
-2.36%
PDS - ESVIF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
SDRL - ESVIF
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
HP - ESVIF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
NE - ESVIF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
PTEN - ESVIF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More

PTEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PTEN has been closely correlated with NBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PTEN jumps, then NBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTEN
1D Price
Change %
PTEN100%
-0.36%
NBR - PTEN
81%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
HP - PTEN
80%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
NE - PTEN
78%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
PDS - PTEN
75%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
RIG - PTEN
74%
Closely correlated
-13.19%
More