Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETADX vs FSMAX
ETADX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ETADX vs FSMAX
ETADX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETADX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETADX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. ETADX (1.33B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ETADX: FSMAX (0.49) vs ETADX (0.25). ETADX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ETADX (9 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ETADX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ETADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETADX: FSMAX (0) vs ETADX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. ETADX (5.40). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. ETADX (30.72).
| ETADX | FSMAX | ETADX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.04 | 3,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.04 | 3,400% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.172 | 13.370 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 40.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.49 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 13.05 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.70 | 63.92 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.72 | 32.77 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers