Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETCDX vs FSMAX
ETCDX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ETCDX vs FSMAX
ETCDX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETCDX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETCDX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. ETCDX (1.38B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ETCDX: FSMAX (0.48) vs ETCDX (0.00). ETCDX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ETCDX (9 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ETCDX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ETCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETCDX: FSMAX (0) vs ETCDX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. ETCDX (14.06). ETCDX return over 5 years is better than : 38.57 vs. FSMAX (35.59).
| ETCDX | FSMAX | ETCDX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.04 | 5,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.04 | 5,543% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.050 | 16.937 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 43.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.06 | 25.67 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.93 | 68.76 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.57 | 35.59 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 149.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers