Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETCGX vs FSMAX
ETCGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ETCGX vs FSMAX
ETCGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETCGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETCGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. ETCGX (3.13B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ETCGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs ETCGX (0.00). ETCGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ETCGX (17 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ETCGX (2.18) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ETCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETCGX: FSMAX (0) vs ETCGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. ETCGX (9.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. ETCGX (-19.96).
| ETCGX | FSMAX | ETCGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.04 | 6,229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.04 | 6,229% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.369 | 13.370 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 40.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 20.57 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.41 | 55.83 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.96 | 33.18 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.80 | 133.82 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers