Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETCGX vs FSMAX
ETCGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ETCGX vs FSMAX
ETCGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ETCGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETCGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. ETCGX (3.33B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ETCGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs ETCGX (0.00). ETCGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ETCGX (17 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). ETCGX (2.18) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ETCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETCGX: FSMAX (0) vs ETCGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. ETCGX (18.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. ETCGX (-14.86).
| ETCGX | FSMAX | ETCGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.04 | 6,229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.04 | 6,229% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.481 | 15.427 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.33B | 42.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.02 | 29.23 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.06 | 73.83 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.86 | 33.65 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.67 | 153.47 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement