ETD
Price
$21.69
Change
+$0.36 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
542.77M
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LZB
Price
$39.85
Change
-$0.14 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.6B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ETD vs LZB

ETD vs LZB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) vs. La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETD and LZB operate in the home furnishings sector, facing similar macroeconomic pressures including softer consumer demand and elevated input costs in recent weeks.
  • LZB has demonstrated stronger recent momentum, with approximately 10-11% gains over the past month amid broader market activity, compared to more limited visible movement in ETD.
  • ETD maintains a debt-free balance sheet and robust gross margins near 61%, supporting resilience despite year-over-year sales declines reported in its latest quarterly results.
  • LZB offers a larger market capitalization and upcoming fiscal year-end earnings release, providing near-term catalysts for sentiment assessment.
  • Sector exposure remains concentrated in consumer cyclical furnishings for both, with trade-offs in scale, dividend consistency, and relative price stability.
  • Market sentiment reflects cautious positioning for the pair, influenced by housing market dynamics and consumer spending trends over the recent period.

Introduction

This comparison examines ETD and LZB, two established players in the U.S. home furnishings industry. Both companies manufacture and retail residential furniture amid a challenging consumer environment marked by variable demand and economic uncertainty. The analysis appeals to investors and traders seeking to evaluate relative performance, business model contrasts, and positioning within the consumer cyclical sector. It provides factual context on recent market behavior without forward-looking projections, aiding those monitoring sector-specific opportunities or portfolio diversification in furnishings stocks.

ETD Overview and Recent Performance

Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) is a manufacturer and retailer of premium home furnishings, operating design centers and wholesale channels focused on interior design solutions. In recent market activity, the stock has traded in a range influenced by broader consumer spending patterns and industry headwinds such as softer retail orders. The company reported fiscal third-quarter results in late April 2026, highlighting net sales declines year-over-year alongside improved gross margins near 61% and a debt-free balance sheet with substantial cash reserves. Sentiment has been shaped by operational efficiencies, including headcount reductions, and ongoing dividend distributions, contributing to a stable yet measured performance profile amid macroeconomic factors.

LZB Overview and Recent Performance

La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) designs, manufactures, and distributes residential furniture, with a prominent emphasis on upholstered products and a network of retail galleries. Over recent weeks, the stock has exhibited positive momentum, posting gains of approximately 10-11% in the past month as market participants assessed sector trends. The company is scheduled to release fiscal fourth-quarter and full-year results in mid-June 2026, following prior periods that reflected mixed sales outcomes tied to weather impacts and demand variability. Performance has been supported by a market capitalization exceeding $1.5 billion and consistent dividend payouts, reflecting resilience within the furnishings space despite broader consumer cyclical pressures.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots execute strategies across thousands of tickers using diverse approaches, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong suitability based on statistical criteria earn placement in the trending section, where users can review ranges of historical win rates, average returns, and risk parameters. All available bots feature unique trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. This resource offers traders a data-driven starting point for exploring automated strategies. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for further details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business model terms, ETD emphasizes vertically integrated design and manufacturing with a focus on higher-end offerings, while LZB centers on volume upholstered furniture with extensive retail distribution. Growth drivers differ through ETD’s emphasis on designer channels and operational cost controls versus LZB’s scale in wholesale and branded retail. Recent momentum favors LZB based on observable monthly gains, contrasting with ETD’s more contained visibility amid similar sector exposure. Risk factors include shared sensitivity to housing activity and consumer sentiment, with ETD benefiting from zero debt and LZB from greater liquidity. Market sentiment reflects parallel caution for both, with contrasts in capitalization size and upcoming earnings visibility creating distinct trade-offs for sector-focused positioning.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent price consistency and relative momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to LZB over ETD. This assessment draws from stronger short-term trend alignment and upcoming earnings visibility, while acknowledging ETD’s balance sheet stability as a supportive element. The outlook remains probabilistic and tied to evolving market conditions rather than definitive outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ETD vs. LZB commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETD is a Buy and LZB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ETD: $21.33 vs. LZB: $39.99)
Brand notoriety: ETD and LZB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ETD: 125% vs. LZB: 174%
Market capitalization -- ETD: $542.77M vs. LZB: $1.6B
ETD [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $542.77M. LZB’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $1.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $27.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $1.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ETD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLZB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ETD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LZB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ETD and LZB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ETD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ETD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LZB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ETD and LZB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ETD (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while LZB (@Home Furnishings) price change was +5.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

ETD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

LZB is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (+0.59% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZB($1.6B) has a higher market cap than ETD($543M). LZB has higher P/E ratio than ETD: LZB (16.19) vs ETD (13.50). LZB YTD gains are higher at: 8.735 vs. ETD (-3.141). LZB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 253M vs. ETD (69.8M). ETD has less debt than LZB: ETD (121M) vs LZB (568M). LZB has higher revenues than ETD: LZB (2.13B) vs ETD (593M).
ETDLZBETD / LZB
Capitalization543M1.6B34%
EBITDA69.8M253M28%
Gain YTD-3.1418.735-36%
P/E Ratio13.5016.1983%
Revenue593M2.13B28%
Total Cash106MN/A-
Total Debt121M568M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ETD vs LZB: Fundamental Ratings
ETD
LZB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3469
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
7779
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4152
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ETD's Valuation (2) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LZB (15). This means that ETD’s stock grew similarly to LZB’s over the last 12 months.

LZB's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ETD (100). This means that LZB’s stock grew similarly to ETD’s over the last 12 months.

ETD's SMR Rating (77) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LZB (79). This means that ETD’s stock grew similarly to LZB’s over the last 12 months.

LZB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ETD (54). This means that LZB’s stock grew similarly to ETD’s over the last 12 months.

ETD's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as LZB (52). This means that ETD’s stock grew similarly to LZB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETDLZB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ETD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LZB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLDCX49.06N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Natural Resources C
OIRDX29.89N/A
N/A
Invesco Rising Dividends R6
DCSVX14.00N/A
N/A
Dunham Small Cap Value C
JABRX49.49-0.21
-0.42%
Janus Henderson Balanced S
FCUEX20.38-0.24
-1.16%
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity Class A

ETD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETD has been loosely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ETD jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETD
1D Price
Change %
ETD100%
+0.76%
MHK - ETD
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
LZB - ETD
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
LEG - ETD
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
MBC - ETD
52%
Loosely correlated
-4.86%
SN - ETD
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
More

LZB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZB has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZB jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZB
1D Price
Change %
LZB100%
+0.83%
ETD - LZB
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
MHK - LZB
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
LEG - LZB
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
FLXS - LZB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
MBC - LZB
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.86%
More