ETD
Price
$29.88
Change
+$0.13 (+0.44%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
759.85M
67 days until earnings call
PATK
Price
$112.13
Change
-$0.38 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.73B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ETD vs PATK

Header iconETD vs PATK Comparison
Open Charts ETD vs PATKBanner chart's image
Ethan Allen Interiors
Price$29.88
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
Volume$450.92K
Capitalization759.85M
Patrick Industries
Price$112.13
Change-$0.38 (-0.34%)
Volume$889.13K
Capitalization3.73B
ETD vs PATK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ETD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PATK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ETD vs. PATK commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ETD is a Hold and PATK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ETD: $29.88 vs. PATK: $112.13)
Brand notoriety: ETD and PATK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ETD: 178% vs. PATK: 273%
Market capitalization -- ETD: $759.85M vs. PATK: $3.73B
ETD [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $759.85M. PATK’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $3.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $29.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $3.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ETD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePATK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ETD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PATK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ETD and PATK are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ETD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PATK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ETD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PATK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ETD is a better buy in the short-term than PATK.

Price Growth

ETD (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +4.31% price change this week, while PATK (@Home Furnishings) price change was +11.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ETD is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

PATK is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (+1.92% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PATK($3.73B) has a higher market cap than ETD($760M). PATK has higher P/E ratio than ETD: PATK (30.47) vs ETD (14.87). PATK YTD gains are higher at: 36.165 vs. ETD (11.652). PATK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 433M vs. ETD (92.9M). ETD has less debt than PATK: ETD (123M) vs PATK (1.63B). PATK has higher revenues than ETD: PATK (3.79B) vs ETD (623M).
ETDPATKETD / PATK
Capitalization760M3.73B20%
EBITDA92.9M433M21%
Gain YTD11.65236.16532%
P/E Ratio14.8730.4749%
Revenue623M3.79B16%
Total CashN/A86.6M-
Total Debt123M1.63B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ETD vs PATK: Fundamental Ratings
ETD
PATK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1613
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1947
SMR RATING
1..100
6160
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2812
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8546

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ETD's Valuation (9) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as PATK (35) in the Building Products industry. This means that ETD’s stock grew similarly to PATK’s over the last 12 months.

ETD's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as PATK (47) in the Building Products industry. This means that ETD’s stock grew similarly to PATK’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's SMR Rating (60) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as ETD (61) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew similarly to ETD’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as ETD (49) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew similarly to ETD’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as ETD (28) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew similarly to ETD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETDPATK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ETD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PATK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMPOX30.08N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value I
PQNAX26.13N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value A
TVOIX39.76N/A
N/A
Touchstone Small Cap Value Institutional
AZMCX18.46N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
MRGHX54.44-0.20
-0.37%
MFS Core Equity R3

ETD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETD has been closely correlated with LZB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ETD jumps, then LZB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETD
1D Price
Change %
ETD100%
+0.44%
LZB - ETD
71%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
MLKN - ETD
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
MBC - ETD
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
PATK - ETD
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
SGI - ETD
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
More

PATK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATK has been loosely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PATK jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PATK
1D Price
Change %
PATK100%
-0.34%
MHK - PATK
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
LZB - PATK
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
ETD - PATK
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
AMWD - PATK
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
MBC - PATK
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More