RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ETLAX (198M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ETLAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs ETLAX (0.15). ETLAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ETLAX (4 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). ETLAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). ETLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETLAX: RWMFX (250) vs ETLAX (1000). ETLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.23 vs. RWMFX (2.09).

	ETLAX	RWMFX	ETLAX / RWMFX
Total Expense Ratio	1.19	0.31	384%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	1.38	0.31	445%
Fund Existence	4 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	8.404	4.508	186%
Front Load	6%	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	1000	250	400%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	198M	218B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.15	1.41	11%
Returns for 1 year	5.23	2.09	251%
Returns for 3 years	48.20	30.24	159%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	27.39	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	82.36	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
FNNEX	86.20	0.31	+0.36%
American Funds New Economy 529-F-3
KMDVX	34.22	N/A	N/A
Keeley Gabelli Mid Cap Dividend A
QIACX	58.61	N/A	N/A
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core IS
PSSMX	29.98	N/A	N/A
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index R3
PPYPX	10.80	N/A	N/A
PIMCO RAE International I-2