RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ETLAX (203M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ETLAX: RWMFX (1.42) vs ETLAX (0.16). ETLAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ETLAX (4 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). ETLAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). ETLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETLAX: RWMFX (250) vs ETLAX (1000). ETLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.62 vs. RWMFX (7.53).

	ETLAX	RWMFX	ETLAX / RWMFX
Total Expense Ratio	1.19	0.31	384%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	1.38	0.31	445%
Fund Existence	4 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	11.726	6.626	177%
Front Load	6%	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	1000	250	400%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	203M	218B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.16	1.42	11%
Returns for 1 year	11.62	7.53	154%
Returns for 3 years	55.79	34.20	163%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	29.34	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	80.88	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
JPVRX	23.91	0.26	+1.10%
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR5
HIMVX	34.61	0.27	+0.79%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Investor
PSOPX	35.00	0.13	+0.37%
JPMorgan Small Cap Value I
SCJKX	8.08	0.03	+0.37%
Steward Covered Call Income R6
VBIAX	54.87	0.13	+0.24%
Vanguard Balanced Index Adm