Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETLAX vs RWMFX
ETLAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts ETLAX vs RWMFX
ETLAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ETLAX (200M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than ETLAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs ETLAX (0.16). ETLAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: ETLAX (4 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). ETLAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). ETLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ETLAX: RWMFX (250) vs ETLAX (1000). ETLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.58 vs. RWMFX (8.54).
| ETLAX | RWMFX | ETLAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.31 | 384% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.31 | 445% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.769 | 2.080 | 614% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.40 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.58 | 8.54 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.73 | 24.40 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 30.09 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement